- #NFS PAYBACK DERELICT MUSTANG DRIVERS#
- #NFS PAYBACK DERELICT MUSTANG DRIVER#
- #NFS PAYBACK DERELICT MUSTANG SERIES#
The extra four gigs is mostly under-utilised, but AMD switched to faster Hynix chips to facilitate the faster memory clocks. The biggest jump in the spec comes on the memory side. Asus - who provided our sample - have gone one step further by adding a further 50MHz to the core. In fact, it's the exact same set-up used on the firm's R9 Fury card, the difference being that the less capable R9 390 actually produces more heat than AMD's slightly cut-down flagship.ĪMD's recipe to take on GTX 970? Take the R9 290, upclock the core, increase memory speed by 500MHz and double memory allocation to 8GB. For our R9 390 8GB review, we're assessing the new Asus DirectCU 3 model - the top-end cooler the company produces, based on top-of-the-line components and boasting beautiful build quality. Secondly, dissipating that heat requires a substantial cooling assembly. In essence then, the performance is there but it comes at a cost: the Hawaii chip now generates even more heat than it did previously, meaning quite remarkable levels of power consumption. It's a simple recipe for success that extracts just enough additional performance on the Radeon R9 390X to make it a contender in its price range, and the formula is arguably even more effective on the R9 390, delivering impressive results up against the GTX 970. The existing Hawaii chips used in R9 290 and 290X are utilised here, receiving an overclock to the GPU core, while the GDDR5 memory modules are replaced with faster, more capable parts with 500gbps of additional bandwidth. Almost a year on and the red team has responded well: it has its limitations, but the performance can't be denied - the new R9 390 8GB is indeed faster than the GTX 970.ĪMD's formula for challenging Nvidia's top-end cards is simple enough. AMD's Radeon R9 290 and 290X suddenly looked excessively expensive and rather mediocre. Factory overclocked examples traded blows with Nvidia's prior flagship - the GTX 780 Ti - and performance could be pushed further, bringing it into line with the top-end GTX 980. When Nvidia's GTX 970 arrived, the high-end graphics card market was blown apart.
#NFS PAYBACK DERELICT MUSTANG DRIVER#
Since NVIDIA not overly long ago enacted a big leap in driver performance itself, it wouldn't be a huge stretch.It's an excellent example of how competition drives performance. The performance suggests either a much superior GPU architecture or a new driver that will help AMD gain a lead on NVIDIA. No CrossFireX tests could be run, unfortunately, since only one sample board made it into their hands, but it can be assumed to be considerable.Īnd since the user nicknamed the card “Captain Jack,” we can look at it as confirmation that it's a Pirate Islands chip that we're expecting.
The Radeon R9 390X has an average performance of 65.6 FPS in all titles, with the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 hovering at a significantly lower 56.6 FPS. If the numbers are right, we can expect a significant performance increase over NVIDIA Maxwell and the existing Radeon R9 290X boards.
On that note, the test platform relied on an Intel Core i7-4790 central processing unit running at 3.6 GHz.
#NFS PAYBACK DERELICT MUSTANG DRIVERS#
Drivers were 344.75 WHQL for NVIDIA cards and Catalyst 14.11.1 BETA for AMD cards.
We have Alien Isolation, Assassins Creed: Unity, Metro Last Light Redux, Dragon Age: Inquisition, and a bunch of others.Ī wide range of graphics cards from NVIDIA and AMD were tested under them, with graphics settings including 2560 x 1440 resolution and IQ settings set to maximum detail. The alleged performance of Radeon R9 390XĮxpected to be powered by a Hawaii XTX graphics processing unit (or something along those lines), the video board has shown up on two benchmark charts showing average performance in several gaming titles.
#NFS PAYBACK DERELICT MUSTANG SERIES#
In any case, the newer report we have for you today deals with the R9 390X for certain, more specifically, the kind of performance we can expect from it.īe advised that while Chiphell has proven to be a viable source of pre-release information in the past, the new rumors should still be taken with at least a modicum of reservation.Īfter all, AMD continues to withhold information about the Pirate Islands GPU series and doesn't seem keen on even hinting at the specs. It may be that the previous rumor about an AMD Radeon R9 380X was just a typo of some sort, with R9 390X still being the card AMD is focusing on at the moment.
Given recent information, the former is more likely. At the moment, it's still not clear if the first graphics card based on AMD Pirate Islands GPU architecture will be the Radeon R9 390X or Radeon R9 380X.
0 kommentar(er)
